4 ms·
And another high court unanimously ruled it as inside the scope of the law. I think it’s obvious at this point that the English High Court got it wrong this tim
by robin_reala 7y ago
And another high court unanimously ruled it as inside the scope of the law. I think it’s obvious at this point that the English High Court got it wrong this time.
- benj111 7y agoI don't think its fair to say the lower court got it wrong, the written and case law here is, sparse. TBH either way it was going to get appealed so the judges decision is moot. I certainly wouldn't be wanting to make the decision, and I'm sure he thought it was above his pay grade also.
- OJFord 7y ago> And another high court unanimously ruled it as inside the scope of the law. Sure, but if high courts are disagreeing about whether it's even within the scope of the law at all, isn't it a bit much to call it 'obviously illegal', i.e. not only in 'obviously' in scope, but also with 'obvious' ruling?