You have such poor use of sources to underline your claims it is almost incredible. What underlines it is seemingly a lack of understanding of statistics, beca

You have such poor use of sources to underline your claims it is almost incredible. What underlines it is seemingly a lack of understanding of statistics, becausee the most "examples", if they can even be called that are from the realm of non-common outlier cases. That's not what statistics operates on mostly - it operates on common cases that cover the largest part of a distribution. Not outlier cases on the ends of a distribution. In every case you gave an example of some uncommon exception, as if that would somehow be an argument for the rule existing?