5 ms·

Think about serverless as framework-as-a-service. It has a learning curve, but if you buy in, it is an amazing productivity boost. (If Reddit’s video hosting b

by abiro 7y ago

Think about serverless as framework-as-a-service. It has a learning curve, but if you buy in, it is an amazing productivity boost. (If Reddit’s video hosting being built and operated on a serverless stack by a single a engineer won’t convince you, I don’t know what will.)

jakoblorz 7y ago
Until he leaves and some poor other dev has to dig into his stack
jmnicolas 7y ago
90% of Reddit videos are unwatchable for me : they start OK then the quality is downgraded to something unwatchable and there's nothing I can do about it. I even tried to download them with youtube-dl but it doesn't work.
- purple_ducks 7y ago
  100% agreed. The initial buffering time on them is ridiculous. I've started uploading to streamable and just posting that link rather than upload video straight to reddit.
- 6510 7y ago
  Makes me wonder in how many other [recursive] ways progress is held back by a lack of it.
panpanna 7y ago
If Reddit video is the poster child then serverless is in big trouble. That thing almost never works.
- StellarTabi 7y ago
  They've already ruined React!
1337shadow 7y ago
In 2010 I was 24 yr old and built a myspace clone SaaS with music and video hosting with everything it implies: large uploads, background jobs, compiling an nginx patch to support range requests, ajax to have videos and music playing while browser, with Django on a 20 bucks/month server. If you're not convinced I don't know what will.
- holler 7y ago
  that sounds cool, what happened to it? that'd be a fun project to work on today :)
  - 1337shadow 7y ago
    I just had no marketing, no partner for that, but I could rebuild that a similar time frame if only I had a plan to make profit out of it. Made it into a local newspapers but that's was the beginning and the end. It's from the times where I was finding musicians in the streets to pay me 50 bucks per website and hosted them on grsecurity hardened gentoo ... which I don't practice at that cost anymore of course. https://www.charentelibre.fr/2010/02/09/article-5-internet-au-service-de-la-musique,309386.php https://www.charentelibre.fr/2010/02/09/article-5-internet-a...
- simmanian 7y ago
  I think the point is, with your Django approach, you'll be stuck doing ops work 9-5 once you start getting customers, whereas with serverless you can spend the time to do more feature dev work.
  - 1337shadow 7y ago
    Not quite sure about that, nowadays I require a couple of 20 bucks/month servers to have one CI/staging and one training/production deployments. I'm at the point where I practice CD as in "deploy each git-push to branchname.ci.example.com and run cypress on it" and still am able to deliver in half a day what the customer would expect to happen in two weeks. And of course, baremetal provides a much better ROI than VMs/VPS/<insert glorified chroot/jail here>.

by abiro 7y ago

jakoblorz 7y ago

Until he leaves and some poor other dev has to dig into his stack

jmnicolas 7y ago

90% of Reddit videos are unwatchable for me : they start OK then the quality is downgraded to something unwatchable and there's nothing I can do about it. I even tried to download them with youtube-dl but it doesn't work.

purple_ducks 7y ago
100% agreed. The initial buffering time on them is ridiculous. I've started uploading to streamable and just posting that link rather than upload video straight to reddit.
6510 7y ago
Makes me wonder in how many other [recursive] ways progress is held back by a lack of it.

panpanna 7y ago

If Reddit video is the poster child then serverless is in big trouble. That thing almost never works.

StellarTabi 7y ago
They've already ruined React!

1337shadow 7y ago

In 2010 I was 24 yr old and built a myspace clone SaaS with music and video hosting with everything it implies: large uploads, background jobs, compiling an nginx patch to support range requests, ajax to have videos and music playing while browser, with Django on a 20 bucks/month server. If you're not convinced I don't know what will.

holler 7y ago
that sounds cool, what happened to it? that'd be a fun project to work on today :)
- 1337shadow 7y ago
  I just had no marketing, no partner for that, but I could rebuild that a similar time frame if only I had a plan to make profit out of it. Made it into a local newspapers but that's was the beginning and the end. It's from the times where I was finding musicians in the streets to pay me 50 bucks per website and hosted them on grsecurity hardened gentoo ... which I don't practice at that cost anymore of course. https://www.charentelibre.fr/2010/02/09/article-5-internet-au-service-de-la-musique,309386.php https://www.charentelibre.fr/2010/02/09/article-5-internet-a...
simmanian 7y ago
I think the point is, with your Django approach, you'll be stuck doing ops work 9-5 once you start getting customers, whereas with serverless you can spend the time to do more feature dev work.
- 1337shadow 7y ago
  Not quite sure about that, nowadays I require a couple of 20 bucks/month servers to have one CI/staging and one training/production deployments. I'm at the point where I practice CD as in "deploy each git-push to branchname.ci.example.com and run cypress on it" and still am able to deliver in half a day what the customer would expect to happen in two weeks. And of course, baremetal provides a much better ROI than VMs/VPS/<insert glorified chroot/jail here>.