The main question remains: what price do you want to pay for procedural fairness, why is it even a major goal? Most people would probably opt for utility mixed

The main question remains: what price do you want to pay for procedural fairness, why is it even a major goal? Most people would probably opt for utility mixed with representational fairness of some degree even when it means law applies to some degree differently to groups and special cases. Justice is not fairness. It has an institution called motive. (Which is often overly simplified or ignored.) It incorporates elements of fairness. And it is hard to train. Not everyone can be Solomon, for example.