3 ms·
The general point is that you have to robustly compromise and satisfice all the goals. People tend to be rather good at it when taken as a group. (Any particula
by AstralStorm 7y ago
The general point is that you have to robustly compromise and satisfice all the goals. People tend to be rather good at it when taken as a group. (Any particular person may be bad at a given subset of all problems.)
It is a kind of optimality condition on all three goals.
The robustness additionally means that should conditions change, the algorithm usually will become better not worse and should a degradation still happen, it will be graceful and not catastrophical.
It's a hard and open problem in ML and especially ANN, design of robust solutions in the space.
Most have really bad problems with it even when debiased.
- sgt101 7y agoHello - do you have a good reference to this area? I bang on about similar ideas whenever allowed, but haven't found good support in the literature. Not that I mind that too much!