3 ms·
I didn't really understand the answer though. The computer is programmable, but the way supremacy is demonstrated is orthogonal to its programmability - it is
by galimaufry 7y ago
I didn't really understand the answer though. The computer is programmable, but the way supremacy is demonstrated is orthogonal to its programmability - it is still demonstrating superiority on just the one problem of simulating itself starting from any initial condition, no?
- jessriedel 7y ago> it is still demonstrating superiority on just the one problem of simulating itself starting from any initial condition, no? It's the "any initial condition" part that is hard. You cannot put a cat, or even a small molecule, in any one of it's possible initial states, let it evolve, measure the outcome, and get reliable answers. (If you could, that would make it a computer! That's all a computer does, assuming the initial states and evolution are rich enough to, e.g., be Turing complete.) > The computer is programmable, but the way supremacy is demonstrated is orthogonal to its programmability The fact that the problem posed by the challenger C is "run an arbitrary quantum circuit" is in fact directly connected to the programmability.