4 ms·
I literally don't understand why somebody would prefer a cop over a camera on every street corner of the US. And just to be double clear, I understand the down
by lovehashbrowns 7y ago
I literally don't understand why somebody would prefer a cop over a camera on every street corner of the US.
And just to be double clear, I understand the downsides of having everything on video; in this hypothetical situation, it's my opinion that having a cop on every street corner of the US is the greater evil, while having a camera in their place is a lesser evil. Both evils, both absurd hypothetical scenarios. Both fun to think about because I like dystopian societies.
- NikolaNovak 7y agoWell, then, I suppose I was / am condescending, with a dose of pity and sadness: - If your message is "I vehemently disagree, with every bone in my body, with the idea of having cops instead of cameras" - sure, that's a valid viewpoint we can have a lot of fun productively discussing, even if we never in the end agree. - If your message is, as you repeatedly indicate, "I literally don't understand [the other point of view]", there is no discussion to be had. From where I'm standing, you are either unwilling, or incapable, of making the effort. A physical/sociopathic lack of empathy, or inability or willingness to process and examine different perspectives, or incredible amount of stubbornness, whatever it may be. If details of other side are presented to you, and you still "literally don't understand" it, then... I don't know, discussion is done one way or another? We are failing on point one of the pyramid of productive/honest discussions and arguments [1]. [note in this framework, understanding, and agreeing, are entirely separate considerations] 1: http://www.openculture.com/2019/06/how-to-argue-with-kindness-and-care-4-rules-from-philosopher-daniel-dennett.html http://www.openculture.com/2019/06/how-to-argue-with-kindnes...