6 ms·
See also Stucchio's impossibility theorem: it is impossible for a given algorithm to be procedurally fair, representationally fair, and utilitarian at the same
by nostrademons 7y ago
See also Stucchio's impossibility theorem: it is impossible for a given algorithm to be procedurally fair, representationally fair, and utilitarian at the same time:
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn7oWIhFffs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn7oWIhFffs
Slides: https://www.chrisstucchio.com/pubs/slides/crunchconf_2018/slides.pdf https://www.chrisstucchio.com/pubs/slides/crunchconf_2018/sl...
- AstralStorm 7y agoThe general point is that you have to robustly compromise and satisfice all the goals. People tend to be rather good at it when taken as a group. (Any particular person may be bad at a given subset of all problems.) It is a kind of optimality condition on all three goals. The robustness additionally means that should conditions change, the algorithm usually will become better not worse and should a degradation still happen, it will be graceful and not catastrophical. It's a hard and open problem in ML and especially ANN, design of robust solutions in the space. Most have really bad problems with it even when debiased.
- sgt101 7y agoHello - do you have a good reference to this area? I bang on about similar ideas whenever allowed, but haven't found good support in the literature. Not that I mind that too much!
- missosoup 7y agoGood presentation