Why would a renowned linguist be a credible source of geopolitics? Especially when his wikipedia article starts off the section on political views by calling hi

Why would a renowned linguist be a credible source of geopolitics? Especially when his wikipedia article starts off the section on political views by calling him a "dissident"? > Chomsky is a prominent political dissident. His political views have changed little since his childhood, when he was influenced by the emphasis on political activism that was ingrained in Jewish working-class tradition. If you want confirmation bias or arguments to feed your matching viewpoint, sure, but neutral, reasoned analysis? Not so much. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky#Political_views https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky#Political_views