3 ms·
So, because there is no permanent evidence of the harm, is the reporter "evil"? ("Evil" is your term.)
by gowld 7y ago
So, because there is no permanent evidence of the harm, is the reporter "evil"? ("Evil" is your term.)
- iamnotacrook 7y agoIt was investigated and there was no harm?
- oliverx0 7y agoNo, I don't think reporting is evil. I quoted the word evil because the article mentioned sarcastically Google's motto. I think raising these issues is important, but saying things like: “It’s been infuriating to watch Google make statements about the alleged things the company does to fight and prevent discrimination and retaliation" is wrong when the company is clearly trying to address them.