3 ms·
1.for animals, between two evils - humans or radioctivity - the radioctivity seems to be a much lesser evil. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-UOHn9PvJ0 http://
by VladRussian 16y ago
1.for animals, between two evils - humans or radioctivity - the radioctivity seems to be a much lesser evil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-UOHn9PvJ0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-UOHn9PvJ0
2. can't not to mention the "Roadside Picnic" (though written long before the Chernobyl)
- Groxx 16y ago1: Well yeah. Humans can be immediately seen to do harm (stimulus-response), radiation can't unless it's at phenomenally dangerous levels that the harm can be detected immediately. And by then there's likely been enough damage to kill the animal anyway. Animals (us included) aren't very good at connecting hugely-delayed effects to their causes. We get by with society and science.