> There's just no basis for that belief in the actual evidence. You Sir have clearly not been paying attention. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/586541

> There's just no basis for that belief in the actual evidence. You Sir have clearly not been paying attention. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/586541/the-uninhabitable-earth-by-david-wallace-wells/ https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/586541/the-uninhabi... > Let's be very conservative and assume global GDP per capita grows at 2% per year. In the baseline scenario, the median world citizen would still be 390% richer than the average person today. Applying the worst global warming impact (20% of GDP), the median person would still be 290% richer than the average person today. This is an absolutely stunning claim to make. It assume growth can just continue in perpetuity forever as if no external factors (food shortages, refugee emergencies, climate wars and economic devastation, air pollution, global pandemics, extreme weather events, ocean rise etc) could possibly have any impact on that continued growth. https://i.cbc.ca/1.5192931.1562703009!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_780/joel-pett-cartoon.jpg https://i.cbc.ca/1.5192931.1562703009!/fileImage/httpImage/i...