You still keep going to this "witness" testimony as if it's a kill all. It isn't. Where Minsky was and with whom has far more weight than what someone said who

You still keep going to this "witness" testimony as if it's a kill all. It isn't. Where Minsky was and with whom has far more weight than what someone said who - for the umpteenth time - WAS ALSO ON JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ISLAND. This "witness" also has zero bearing on anything Stallman wrote, as he was writing under the assumption that the accusation is true. Your continued use of it in defending Stallman denotes bad faith. > ...RMS did not excuse the accusations of sex... No, he only wrote a blog post saying that diddling kids should be legal. I can infer from that his thoughts on the Minsky situation. > No, I'm only repeatedly restating what RMS said in different forms in a vain hope that one of these restatements "clicks" with you. You're reiterating your interpretation as if it's valid. It is not, for all the aforementioned reasons.