4 ms·
Eh, maybe? It "worked" in that they're choosing to not renew the contracts over the next year, but he admitted that over the last year employees have been fight
by endianswap 7y ago
Eh, maybe? It "worked" in that they're choosing to not renew the contracts over the next year, but he admitted that over the last year employees have been fighting for this and have been ignored until now, which is pretty shitty. For revenue that appears to be only $95k USD (the amount they're earning from the contract that they're instead going to match to charity)?
https://twitter.com/DannyPage/status/1176155955173552133 https://twitter.com/DannyPage/status/1176155955173552133
- floatingatoll 7y agoThere are two ways to get something right: 1) The first time 2) Later than that They did the second. It’s sucks that it isn’t the first, and it sucks that they didn’t pick the right horse during the race up until this point. But they changed their mind, openly and in plainly spoken terms. “Worked” doesn’t need a qualifier here. Their failure to implement #1 correctly, and their pivot to implement #2, will help them serve as a lesson to others.
- dredmorbius 7y agoAlso: 1. Insufficiently. 2. Sufficiently. The question is on this aspect.
- krainboltgreene 7y ago> They did the second. No, I disagree. What they have done is literally the minimum amount of effort. The right thing to do is not to "continue to do what we're doing, offering a passive promise to not get more money."
- floatingatoll 7y agoWhat is the right thing to do?
- krainboltgreene 7y agoResign and cancel the contract.