2 ms·
Isn't chef open source? This just means that ICE will hire a few people to maintain their build pipeline rather than outsourcing it to a third party.
by commandlinefan 7y ago
Isn't chef open source? This just means that ICE will hire a few people to maintain their build pipeline rather than outsourcing it to a third party.
- ng12 7y agoObviously. Same thing with Palantir -- ICE could just move their data to a different solution. This isn't about affecting change, it's about feeling good about ourselves.
- dragonwriter 7y ago> This just means that ICE will hire a few people to maintain their build pipeline rather than outsourcing it to a third party Assuming ICE made the most efficient decision in the first place, the new option will be less efficient, imposing a cost. If the most efficient alternative is also unwilling to contract with ICE for the same reason, the cost is higher. Etc. Of course, the goal in any refuse-to-participate campaign is to build to reach more essential rather than peripheral service providers, most particularly the people directly implementing (not setting) the opposed policy.