2 ms·
> But that's misleading. The federal government itself owns more than a quarter of U.S. debt, money the government essentially owes itself. It’s an accounting e
by JackFr 7y ago
> But that's misleading. The federal government itself owns more than a quarter of U.S. debt, money the government essentially owes itself. It’s an accounting entry. As an asset and a liability, it effectively cancels out.
Well, no. These bonds are held in the Social Security Trust Fund, and while yes in one sense they are both an asset and a liability, they are also funding a future liability (although not all of it). So you can cancel them out against the future liability or the current one, but not both.
(As to Social Security being underfunded, I had an econ professor explain Social Security could be fully funded immediately if the Treasury could just issue a new class of bonds which cost a penny and are redeemed for a trillion dollars in ten years, and sell them to the Trust Fund.)
- ThrustVectoring 7y agoYou cancel them out against the current liabilities. Retiree spending is entirely funded by current production; the only real question is whether it's through taxation or savings (savings is, after all, current production that is sold and not consumed. This is essentially a tax.) Social Security's funding level is completely irrelevant - what matters is primarily how wealthy society is when current workers retire, and secondarily how much future workers will be willing to save and pay taxes.