3 ms·
Serverless makes a lot of sense if you are paying the system administrator. Most of the cost for running servers I've seen is the support of those servers. Whet
by foxyv 7y ago
Serverless makes a lot of sense if you are paying the system administrator. Most of the cost for running servers I've seen is the support of those servers. Whether it's paying DevOps or a SysAdmin team. However I found it was much too slow to meet SLAs. It takes time to provision lambdas on demand. Then again we did our POC back when Lambda first came online. I think now you can pre-provision tasks which makes things a lot faster.
Lambda meets the requirement of being very low maintenance, reactive, and scalable. I'm not surprised they are charging a premium for it. You don't have to pay multiple $100k sys-admins to keep it running.