5 ms·
I'm well aware of the phenomenon but it is not the kind of interruption I'm talking about. To be clear, I'm talking about men-interrupting-men-and-women-becaus
by kranner 7y ago
I'm well aware of the phenomenon but it is not the kind of interruption I'm talking about.
To be clear, I'm talking about men-interrupting-men-and-women-because-they-are-interrupters vs women-interrupting-men-and-women-because-they-are-interrupters, and not men-interrupting-women-because-they-are-sexist. The context of the article is the former, clearly.
Also, I don't consider "is there any reason to think" to be confrontational.
- freddie_mercury 7y agoI think you are misunderstanding the research. It shows exactly what you are talking about; the link discusses just one recent subset of the phenomenon. Men interrupt men more than women do. Men interrupt women more than women do. Men interrupt more than women.