2 ms·
This made me look up Caltrain Daily ridership[1] which is about 65K/day. Now Caltrain is not considered "light rail" because it uses regular rails and locomotiv
by ChuckMcM 7y ago
This made me look up Caltrain Daily ridership[1] which is about 65K/day. Now Caltrain is not considered "light rail" because it uses regular rails and locomotives with their accompanying "full size" train cars. Versus the lighter framed "light rail" cars that VTA uses for its service.
It is interesting that while CalTrain is over crowded at commute times and struggles with having enough capacity, the light rail system is underutilized. Citylab covered some of the issues of the light rail system but I would really like a transportation expert's evaluation of Bart/Caltrain/Muni/Lightrail/Bus service in the greater Bay Area. There seems to be a huge opportunity here even though I get that there are big systemic forces that resist making those changes.
[1] http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/_Marketing/pdf/2018+Annual+Passenger+Counts.pdf?v=2 http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/_Marketing/pdf/2018+Annual+Pa...
- pcwalton 7y ago> It is interesting that while CalTrain is over crowded at commute times and struggles with having enough capacity, the light rail system is underutilized. True in San Jose—VTA is one of the least functional public transit systems in the entire country—but not in San Francisco. The state considers Muni Metro to be overcrowded, in fact: https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/CCTS_FebWorkshop_BreakoutHandout_ShortMed_SFMetro_FINAL.pdf https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/CCTS_FebWorkshop_Brea...