5 ms·
I'm like 99% sure Google said "what's the most contrived workload that technically counts as quantum supremacy" and went from there... That being said, we cert
by deepnotderp 7y ago
I'm like 99% sure Google said "what's the most contrived workload that technically counts as quantum supremacy" and went from there...
That being said, we certainly live in interesting times.
- ineedasername 7y agoEven if it's highly contrived, it's still something that they found a task for which the quantum computer is superior. It points the way towards a more general superiority where some at least have doubted the possibility.
- bufferoverflow 7y agoSimulating a drop of water falling on the floor accurately at the molecular level would take thousands (if not millions) of years on the best supercomputer today. Does it mean my water dropper is a better physical computer than regular computers?
- ycui1986 7y agoThis is to the point. The universe is a giant big computer even without quantum involved. If the starting state of the computation is not predefined, the so-called computer is no difference from randomly flipping some coins. What the paper showed is no difference from showing the wind did not change the result of coin flipping.
- deepnotderp 7y agoI agree, I'm just pointing out that it's not useful yet
- 6nf 7y agoEven if this 'computation' is useless at everything except proving quantum supremacy is possible, that's still a serious milestone.