5 ms·
Hi. A related project that takes a more human-powered approach is PrivacySpy (https://privacyspy.org https://privacyspy.org). Would be neat to see how these too
by epoch_100 7y ago
Hi. A related project that takes a more human-powered approach is PrivacySpy (https://privacyspy.org https://privacyspy.org). Would be neat to see how these tools intersect.
PrivacySpy is open source, community run, and more about grading policies on a standardized rubric (as opposed to entrusting that to ML), so these tools might complement one another.
(Full disclosure: I'm a contributor to PrivacySpy.)
- jchook 7y agoAnother one: https://tosdr.org/ https://tosdr.org/
- epoch_100 7y agoToS;DR is great, although it's more focused on terms of service so if you're looking for privacy-only info, you'll have to cut through a bit of noise.
- shlant 7y agoWe have something similar as well over at https://privacy.commonsense.org/ https://privacy.commonsense.org/. We have taken different ideas from many different implementations and applied them more specifically to ed tech products.
- abathur 7y agoOn the off chance the various responders in this sub-thread see this comment, for a while I've hoped someone would advocate for privacy/TOS policies to follow a similar model to OSS licensing. Normal people could conceivably read and understand a given policy if the knowledge scaled. Any substantial adoption would help focus effort/resources on services that deviate from the terms. Sites that are already repositories of this knowledge could play some part in codifying best-practices, advocating for adoption, and tracking progress.