3 ms·
Tl;Dr; We don't know and this article sheds little extra light on the subject. It asks questions and doesn't answer them. I've left the conclusion here to sav
by jdsully 7y ago
Tl;Dr; We don't know and this article sheds little extra light on the subject. It asks questions and doesn't answer them.
I've left the conclusion here to save you time:
> “Spying was one thing, but his willingness to switch sides in the middle of an armed conflict, and fight against the men who had a year earlier been fighting by his side, was something that people of that time and maybe ours could simply not understand.”
- softwaredoug 7y agoI mean, I wasn’t expecting original research in the article. So I learned a lot reading it...
- zaphirplane 7y agothat Is also true about civil wars and all the admired figures from any civil wars did it. Isn’t the us revolution a form of civil war, presumably some of the soldiers on both sides where not British specially at the beginning