3 ms·
For me it's not about finding the information by typing in a URL. It's more about scanning and having a clue what I'm going to see by the url I'm clicking on.
by jward 18y ago
For me it's not about finding the information by typing in a URL. It's more about scanning and having a clue what I'm going to see by the url I'm clicking on. A giant random number really has no meaning or value in this context.
- dmose 18y agoFor me, it's pretty irrelevant because I'm a developer using a development knowledge base (MSDN) and have been for over a decade. By your argument, HN is a fail too, yet you still click on the links.
- william42 18y agoHN isn't a reference work like Wikipedia or the MSDN Knowledge Base, so it's less important here. But the real reason that Microsoft's URLs suck is that the MSDN Knowledge Base is an older product than Google's, built back when the web was new and people didn't realize that their URLs sucked. And one thing that I respect Microsoft for is actually caring about reverse compatibility. (Sidenote: This is why you should think about your URLs. They are how your website will be presented to the world.)