4 ms·
Blockbuster did put lots of money into developing streaming technology and absolutely saw it as the future. But they were too early and gained no traction. By t
by gandalfian 7y ago
Blockbuster did put lots of money into developing streaming technology and absolutely saw it as the future. But they were too early and gained no traction. By the time the moment arrived they no longer had the money and energy. But overal I agree Netflix wouldn't have been Netflix if it had sold out early.
- basch 7y agoAlso, the main other party in the 2000ish Blockbuster streaming service was Enron. So it probably would have collapsed or fallen into troubled times and been acquired, no matter what.
- technofiend 7y agoEnron was also trying to create bandwidth commodities that traded the same as energy, which was typical of Enron. Create a market, make use of the market and double dip on profits. https://www.wired.com/2001/11/enron-a-bandwidth-bloodbath/ https://www.wired.com/2001/11/enron-a-bandwidth-bloodbath/
- agumonkey 7y agoI'd love a list of all the too-earlys ..
- gandalfian 7y agoI can only remember the conman who claimed he could do broadband over dialup. https://web.archive.org/web/20170320224412/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/050502/met_9322821.html https://web.archive.org/web/20170320224412/http://jacksonvil... but statistically they must have thrown money at someone who wasn't a crook, mustn't they?
- new_realist 7y agoSix Degrees: Facebook met LinkedIn in 1997.
- agumonkey 7y agooh yeah .. indeed too early
- INTPenis 7y agoMy favorite is Microsoft Terra which was designed mostly to show off their SQL database. THey had no idea about the power of personal data that Google would exploit much later with Google Earth.
- agumonkey 7y agoAh well, very similarly DEC made altavista to show off so never thought of it as a product. Then Google came.
- INTPenis 7y agoReally? I had no idea Altavista was from DEC. In school in sweden we actually had a computer class where they taught us to use altavista. This was before Google blew up.
- agumonkey 7y agoaltavista history is "fun" https://digital.com/about/altavista/ https://digital.com/about/altavista/
- drpgq 7y agoFriendster?
- kjksf 7y ago> But they were too early and gained no traction As I understand the history of Blockbuster, the CEO was actually winning against Netflix. It was obviously costly fight (needed lots of investment). The Blockbuster CEO met his performance goal and was expecting hefty bonus but Carl Icahn, a board member and big Blockbuster shareholder, torpedoed the bonus award. CEO quit. The next CEO reduced spending in dvd-by-mail and online streaming and Netflix won. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110318006089/en/Happened-Blockbuster-Story-John-Antioco-Carl-Icahn https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110318006089/en/Hap... So you could say that Blockbuster lost because Carl Icahn is an idiot and single-handedly destroyed Blockbuster. There's no indication that they lost because they were "too early". In fact, their online product was "pay-per-view" while Netflix was "all-you-can-eat" https://www.cnet.com/news/netflix-vs-blockbuster-whats-the-best-service-for-streaming-and-dvds/ https://www.cnet.com/news/netflix-vs-blockbuster-whats-the-b...
- zaphirplane 7y agoToo early can be, when bandwidth was slow and download cap were small. Downloading was discouraging