2 ms·
But is a ISA that wasn’t designed for embedded really that well suited for it? And if the silicon design is new, we are not benefiting all the much from decade
by tambourine_man 7y ago
But is a ISA that wasn’t designed for embedded really that well suited for it?
And if the silicon design is new, we are not benefiting all the much from decades of battle testing, right?
I can’t imagine how a clean, embedded first 32bit ISA design wouldn’t be more appropriate.
- zokier 7y ago> But is a ISA that wasn’t designed for embedded really that well suited for it? But 8051 was designed for embedded: > The Intel MCS-51 (commonly termed 8051) is a single chip microcontroller (MCU) series developed by Intel in 1980 for use in embedded systems (wikipedia) > I can’t imagine how a clean, embedded first 32bit ISA design wouldn’t be more appropriate I guess we'll see how riscv will develop.
- tambourine_man 7y agoAh, I didn’t know that. I thought it was a repurposed chip. That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
- mjw1007 7y agoThe 8051 was always designed for "embedded". It's a microcontroller. The ISA is nothing like the 8080's.
- Taniwha 7y agoYes but it's a bitch to program, multiple memory hierarchies and address spaces (at least 3), only one index register (hard to move stuff), and enough variants that "8051" is more of a species definition than of a particular architecture (disclaimer: I sell an 8051 based product, have sold them in the past - never again)
- andrewshadura 7y agoIt was designed for embedded use.