What abuse is that? The example in the article is the empty box scam. >At least if the seller is the one receiving an empty box he could set up procedures to a

What abuse is that? The example in the article is the empty box scam. >At least if the seller is the one receiving an empty box he could set up procedures to attempt to prove it. I definitely agree that would be a better outcome, but I think it is a stretch to blame royal mail for this. If someone really wants their package to get lost in shipping there's not much you can do about it.