I was a member of the Institute of Directors and they try to espouse the importance of ethics: https://www.iod.org.nz/Portals/0/Publications/Founding%20Docs/Cod

I was a member of the Institute of Directors and they try to espouse the importance of ethics: https://www.iod.org.nz/Portals/0/Publications/Founding%20Docs/Code%20of%20Practice.pdf https://www.iod.org.nz/Portals/0/Publications/Founding%20Doc... And, in my country's law at least, some ethics are codified into legal requirements for directors: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0105/latest/DLM319570.html http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0105/latest/D... s131 to s138a Of course, in both the ethics are basically "Work in the best interests of the company". Which may not ethically align with the greater good of society. But that's where criminal law comes into it, hopefully. As for professional engineers, sadly, there's no requirement in my country that an engineer be a member of IPENZ, as notoriously demonstrated by the case of Alan Reay, who was responsible for a substandard building that killed 115 people in the Christchurch 2011 earthquake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTV_Building#Royal_Commission_of_Inquiry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTV_Building#Royal_Commission_... He simply resigned from IPENZ to avoid their ability to censure him, and sadly, our corporate manslaughter laws were found to be woefully lacking around this (and a coal mine explosion): https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/345102/corporate-manslaughter-law-on-cards-minister https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/345102/corporate-manslau... Question remains too, how would you define ethics for a programmer? Some programmers consider it unethical to work in adtech or porn, yet plenty of others don't. What about facial recognition techology? It's like the old joke - no ethical programmer would write a function called bombBaghdad(), instead they'd write it as bomb() and pass the city as a parameter.