> In my opinion, which is worth nil: Why not both? Because for a start the source is tainted, and nothing ensures that the alleged evidence used to extort Rui

> In my opinion, which is worth nil: Why not both? Because for a start the source is tainted, and nothing ensures that the alleged evidence used to extort Rui Pinto's targets was not entirely made up. Secondly, although the accusations deserve an investigation, accepting prejudicial info release by criminals following a botched extortion campaign ends up validating extortion as a business model.