Seems to me the thrust of the actual paper is: > To demonstrate quantum supremacy, we compare our quantum processor against state-of-the-art classical computer

Seems to me the thrust of the actual paper is: > To demonstrate quantum supremacy, we compare our quantum processor against state-of-the-art classical computers in the task of sampling the output of a pseudo-random quantum circuit So it's better at being itself than a classical computer simulating itself. I suppose this is _something_, but there's no demonstrable business value to doing that.