Articles like these ultimately say nothing new either. It points to the uncertainty in the implications of genemoddings future where essentially the stakes are

Articles like these ultimately say nothing new either. It points to the uncertainty in the implications of genemoddings future where essentially the stakes are higher and often so far less reversible than digital debugging. Okayyy, but the average folk would take this less as a warning and more of an endorsement towards an idea of a bioethical imperative to slow or obfuscate any progress imo(after all people buy into gmo skepticism and that's based in ignorance to basic biology).