> The only responsibility proposed here is to present obviously illegal union-busting as grounds for terminating a contract. What of the alleged anti-union act

> The only responsibility proposed here is to present obviously illegal union-busting as grounds for terminating a contract. What of the alleged anti-union activity is "obviously illegal?" As far as I can read, USW accuses HCL of scheduling mandatory meetings where it makes anti-union statements. That is not illegal. USW never in its press release claimed that any of HCL's actions were illegal, nor did the article claim that any illegal conduct had taken place.