4 ms·

The only responsibility proposed here is to present obviously illegal union-busting as grounds for terminating a contract. But there is a precedent here; Apple

The only responsibility proposed here is to present obviously illegal union-busting as grounds for terminating a contract. But there is a precedent here; Apple has even stronger agreements in place with Chinese manufacturers with respect to workplace safety, health and maximum working hours. These are supported both by the public and the government. Why should we be more enthusiastic about policing fair workplace practices in China than the US?

asdfasgasdgasdg 7y ago
> The only responsibility proposed here is to present obviously illegal union-busting as grounds for terminating a contract. What of the alleged anti-union activity is "obviously illegal?" As far as I can read, USW accuses HCL of scheduling mandatory meetings where it makes anti-union statements. That is not illegal. USW never in its press release claimed that any of HCL's actions were illegal, nor did the article claim that any illegal conduct had taken place.