I'm not of the opinion that we're all helpless children who need to wait for the government to appear and use overwhelming force to correct obvious violations o

I'm not of the opinion that we're all helpless children who need to wait for the government to appear and use overwhelming force to correct obvious violations of individual freedom. > Google is not a detective agency, and it shouldn't be. If it observes illegal activities occurring on its own property, or has substantial knowledge of them, that would be one thing, but I imagine that if HCL is doing this dirty stuff they are not going to make it obvious. We are discussing well sourced evidence by a reputable news organization organization. This is hardly the domain of rumors and whispers. > Finally, I doubt the unionizing HCL workers would appreciate the remedy that some people here are proposing. Well, HCL could choose to discontinue the anti-union activities to make the problems go away, and any sane shareholder in their business has to ask seriously if unionization will cost the company more than losing service contracts with one of the biggest companies in the US. > If anything should be considered anti-union, this proposed remedy is it! Do you think anyone finds this line of argument compelling? You're saying, "The only remedy is to do nothing, because any action might change the status quo." But folks aren't unionizing because they like the status quo. If HCL falls apart, so be it. Its not clear why they should be so easily forgiven for obviously violating the law.