4 ms·
Why use a known fraudulent technique? Explain why it’s more beneficial than just thoroughly vetting and interviewing/interrogating candidates. It’s embarrassi
by stallmanite 7y ago
Why use a known fraudulent technique? Explain why it’s more beneficial than just thoroughly vetting and interviewing/interrogating candidates.
It’s embarrassing.
Edit: It’s odd how you seem to be trying to make this a personal/emotional thing about wanting to lie to the MIC, etc. If I was a huge supporter of the intelligence community I’d want them to quit wasting time, money, and credibility on an ineffective scam. Also I explicitly stated that I’m not particularly intelligent so why you are painting me as a know-it-all for daring to question this practice.
Enlighten me, please.
- mc32 7y agoWonder why they haven replaced it with fMRI? It can’t be worse.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- nyolfen 7y agowhy do cops interrogate people instead of just investigating them?
- stallmanite 7y agoInterrogation is a real thing that works. Scientology e-meter type bs is not.