I stopped reading when figure one showed only two data points on a chart without zero based y-axis. It portrays a divergence that -looks- like a multi factor di

I stopped reading when figure one showed only two data points on a chart without zero based y-axis. It portrays a divergence that -looks- like a multi factor difference, but is only a 20% at most divergence. This coupled without historical comparison for normal variance and the repeated use of excited adjectives, makes for an alarmist article.