The article references a Geekbench score that's now taken offline. Google Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=de&ei=ewaGXa_NDoLSkwWai5LwBg&q

The article references a Geekbench score that's now taken offline. Google Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=de&ei=ewaGXa_NDoLSkwWai5LwBg&q=cache%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fbrowser.geekbench.com%2Fv5%2Fcpu%2F170821&oq=cache%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fbrowser.geekbench.com%2Fv5%2Fcpu%2F170821&gs_l=psy-ab.3...1047.2108..2466...0.0..0.120.464.6j1......0....1j2..gws-wiz.......0j0i67j0i131.ZfZMOTb1Yww&ved=0ahUKEwjv9peD5eHkAhUC6aQKHZqFBG4Q4dUDCAo&uact=5 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=de&ei=ewaGXa... Results (also in the article): Geekbench v5.0.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit); 1275 single core, 23015 multi-core for 32C/64T @ 3.59GHz Base Frequency (and with 32GB DDR4, no info on 4 or 8 channel).