6 ms·
Absolutely, I have done no research on this but on his website [1] he claims: > Strength: The fundamental principles of a yurt’s design creates a structure tha
by aurbano 7y ago
Absolutely, I have done no research on this but on his website [1] he claims:
> Strength: The fundamental principles of a yurt’s design creates a structure that is surprisingly strong. The compression and tension of the walls and roof can hold thousands of pounds of weight from the snow. The round shape allows high winds to be diverted gracefully around the structure. Unlike a normal house, a yurt doesn’t rely on rigidity to be stable. Because of its flexible nature, a yurt can better withstand natural disasters like earthquakes.
So maybe it's true and they are actually sturdier than it seems?
[1] https://doityurtself.com/is-it-for-you/ https://doityurtself.com/is-it-for-you/ (scroll down to "The positives of yurts")
- mikeg8 7y agoI think from a structural engineering perspective, yurts are strong for their weight/materials but most construction failures don’t involve a structure falling, it’s matrierials/joint failure from water/UV exposure and penetrations. Yurts were developed to be semi-permanent structures for nomadic peoples. I would not expect them to last more than 15-20 years because of the toll the water and sun will take on their “cheap” materials and simple construction methods.
- CriticalCathed 7y agoCheaper to replace a yurt than a roof on a traditional home, which you are supposed to do in a range of time similar to your predicted lifespan of a yurt. And that includes the entire yurt, when in reality you'd probably only have to replace the plastic and frabric which is considerably less expensive than the entire yurt. I'm not sure if I'm under-thinking this or if you guys are.
- whimwell 7y agoYou’re not wrong per se, but the polyvinyl fabric roof or wall on a yurt can be replaced in a matter of hours for a relatively reasonable price. If you have to do that every 15 years, I think you’re doing pretty well.