3 ms·

This was expected at least 3 months ago: https://interestingengineering.com/googles-quantum-processor-may-achieve-quantum-supremacy-in-months https://interestin

This was expected at least 3 months ago: https://interestingengineering.com/googles-quantum-processor-may-achieve-quantum-supremacy-in-months https://interestingengineering.com/googles-quantum-processor... Additional sources: https://gizmodo.com/google-says-its-achieved-quantum-supremacy-a-world-fir-1838299829 https://gizmodo.com/google-says-its-achieved-quantum-suprema... (paywalled) https://www.ft.com/content/b9bb4e54-dbc1-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1f17 https://www.ft.com/content/b9bb4e54-dbc1-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1...

morningseagulls 7y ago
>This was expected at least 3 months ago Here's the Quanta report they quoted: https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-nevens-law-describe-quantum-computings-rise-20190618/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-nevens-law-describe-quan... I remembered seeing that and still feeling a bit skeptical. It seems like you could perhaps achieve "quantum supremacy" and yet not have quantum computing devices that are actually "useful".