7 ms·
>The best we can do is what we've been doing - regulate around it as much as possible, even if such attempts are doomed to be ineffective. We can do much bette
by HBKXNCUO 7y ago
>The best we can do is what we've been doing - regulate around it as much as possible, even if such attempts are doomed to be ineffective.
We can do much better than that. We can take a deep look into our own society and address the underlying reasons why people are trying to hurt themselves and others in such large numbers.
For instance, we could try to figure out why over 20,000 people per year are killing themselves with firearms. Is some aspect of their lives making them despair? If so, let's take a serious look into the causes, and try to correct them.
There are parts of the country with extremely low rates of violence and near universal gun ownership. Let's figure out what's going on in those parts of the country, and try to make the rest of the country like that.
Are there any commonalities we can identify between people who attempt to commit mass atrocities? If so, let's figure out what they are, and see if there's anything we can do to reduce the incidence of those commonalities in the general population.
How does that sound?
- krapp 7y ago>How does that sound? Sounds fine, I support everything in your comment. However, I believe keeping guns out of the hands of people who would harm themselves and others is also a legitimate part of the solution. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court and Constitution of my country disagree with me.
- HBKXNCUO 7y agoEveryone believes that trying to keep guns out of the hands of people that would harm themselves and others is a part of the solution. That's why there are laws against felons possessing them.