3 ms·
Bulma is a gamechanger for me in this regard. I can get something professional looking up and running with literally no design experience. There are obviously
by jpxw 7y ago
Bulma is a gamechanger for me in this regard. I can get something professional looking up and running with literally no design experience.
There are obviously limitations to it, but for my use cases it's great.
- applecrazy 7y agoSeconded. Bulma is the tool of choice for 99% of my projects. I have all the CSS classes almost memorized.
- quasse 7y agoBulma looks fairly similar to Bootstrap v4 as far as visual output goes. Any major reasons to use one or the other?
- williamdclt 7y agoWe looked into both when writing an open-source admin interface for NestJS. We went for bootstrap because: - Nobody likes bootstrap, but everybody knows bootstrap (good for an open-source lib) - Better browser compatibility - Better accessibility - Plenty of UI widgets built on top of bootstrap (we don't use them, but people using the lib could) - About as big as each other
- jpxw 7y agoNo solid reasons honestly, other than personal preference. Bulma just looks better out of the box to me.
- thanatropism 7y agoI'm an API guy who uses Python and Hy and I'm getting started with some front-end programming on my weekends to have some hobby projects with a public face. It annoys me that every website template now expects you to install via npm. Bulma is all-out with that. If you dig down, it's apparently because the DSL Sass is used to generate CSS. But there are Sass compilers in C and Python and probably in Prolog at this juncture.