3 ms·
Not sure what you're talking about, the courts have ruled that NSLs are constitutional.
by guelo 7y ago
Not sure what you're talking about, the courts have ruled that NSLs are constitutional.
- mirimir 7y agoThat's the problem. I'm almost 100% sure that, if you explained an NSL to Jefferson, he'd say that it clearly wasn't constitutional. Washington too, very likely. Adams, though, might have gone either way.
- simplecomplex 7y agoThe Supreme Court has been a treasonous organization since Wickard v Filburn (8 of 9 justices then of course appointed by Roosevelt) NSLs are unconstitutional. > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
- stjohnswarts 7y agoI agree there is nothing at all constitutional about them, just like the Patriot Act.