3 ms·
Pretty sure digging past comments goes against the guidelines. It's also a primitive an absolutist way of judging a comment (rather than on, say, its substance)
by creaghpatr 7y ago
Pretty sure digging past comments goes against the guidelines. It's also a primitive an absolutist way of judging a comment (rather than on, say, its substance).
- WhompingWindows 7y agoWhat if the substance of the comment is just erroneous or poorly intention-ed? How am I supposed to tell if it's a paid corporate shill or a genuine fossil fuel lover?
- pstch 7y agoThe idea is to assume good faith. If it can't be done, I think not answering is the best course of action.