4 ms·
That is a lot of text for not addressing my point at all!?
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 7y ago
That is a lot of text for not addressing my point at all!?
- nsfyn55 7y agoYou asked how it would help and I explained exactly how it would help. I directly addressed your point. Your content free, one sentence response not withstanding. Is there something specific you'd like clarification about?
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 7y agoHow exactly you think preventing your customers from using secure passwords is going to demonstrate due diligence?
- nsfyn55 7y agoLook at that sally, a false equivocation right out of the gate. I'll just change your text so that it represents what I actually said .... >How exactly does taking steps that have previously been used in civil suits to demonstrate due diligence such enforcing password requirements going to demonstrate due diligence? Well I'm glad you asked billy! The answer is tautology. Thanks for playing. This argument is stupid. You want to talk about yak shaving, theoretical nonsense. FWIW I agree with you and think that password requirements are dumb, but you live in the real world. These are the legal realities of IT policy.