3 ms·

Your memory is wrong. You may want to look that up before making such a dumb claim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_from_U.S._drone_strikes#To

• golergka 7y ago
  But it is EXCEPTIONALLY low - even more so than I remember. > Starting in the 1980s, it was often claimed that 90 percent of the victims of modern wars were civilians. > The Vietnamese government has estimated the number of Vietnamese civilians killed in the Vietnam War at two million, and the number of NVA and Viet Cong killed at 1.1 million—estimates which approximate those of a number of other sources.[19] This would give a civilian-combatant fatality ratio of approximately 2:1, or 67%. > During the First Chechen War, 4,000 separatist fighters and 40,000 civilians are estimated to have died, giving a civilian-combatant ratio of 10:1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio#Chechen_wars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio#Cheche...
  • mad_tortoise 7y ago
    So essentially what you're saying is that it's ok to kill million's of people in Iraq and Afghanistan as long as it fit's into a ratio that they're killing enough enemies to make civilians inconsequential? What utter bullshit you spout and a sad world you live occupy in your own head.