> Why judge an article or opinion on what it's not instead of what it is? I think that's an uncharitable take. We all get that TFA is trying to be poetic, but

> Why judge an article or opinion on what it's not instead of what it is? I think that's an uncharitable take. We all get that TFA is trying to be poetic, but poetic sentiments can be profound or shallow, and if someone finds this article shallow (as I do myself) that doesn't mean they're attacking it for being poetic. Also, suggesting the commenter might be having a bad day doesn't come off at all the way I think you intend.