3 ms·
Location data is explicitly called out as sensitive personal information in the text of the bill, so it's definitely not exempt as a category of data. > (e) Ma
by morganherlocker 7y ago
Location data is explicitly called out as sensitive personal information in the text of the bill, so it's definitely not exempt as a category of data.
> (e) Many businesses collect personal information from California consumers. They may know where a consumer lives and how many children a consumer has, how fast a consumer drives, a consumer’s personality, sleep habits, biometric and health information, financial information, precise geolocation information, and social networks, to name a few categories.
As to how this will interact with free speech - in this case, speech of the company - is a bit of an open question. One of the assumptions of the bill though is that selling telemetry data about a consumer is not a form of protected speech, and that adding some restrictions to this practice is reasonable.
- SamReidHughes 7y agoFor a law to cover the set of data which is not necessary to exercise free speech would infringe on free speech, because the set and its complement are not disconnected sets. So either the company has stay on the safe side, and delete information necessary for it to exercise free speech, or miss the other way and be subject to penalties. The example I gave, by the way, is a real one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8418885 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8418885