> The reality is that my only burden is the state in which I operate, otherwise we're interfering with the sovereignty of the state in which I reside... don't t

> The reality is that my only burden is the state in which I operate, otherwise we're interfering with the sovereignty of the state in which I reside... don't think they'll like that. Good luck challenging that one. I mean, that's exactly what's going on. You can choose to follow State Y's laws when serving customers in State Y, or you can choose to not serve customers in State Y. But if you choose to not follow State Y's laws while serving customers in State Y, then State Y can use whatever leverage they can get their hands on to keep you out of State Y. That's State Y flexing their own sovereignty when it comes to protecting their citizens, which is the flipside of your argument about your state protecting you.