3 ms·

> Noone in particular. Just let the lack of food do its thing. So the poor then?

• jjuhl 7y ago
  Fine. Or the rich if you like - although there are fewer of those so the impact won't be as significant. But whatever. I don't care. The point is we need to reduce the number. Who goes, specifically, is somewhat irrelevant.
  • dlivingston 7y ago
    Besides the absolute inhumanity of mass genocide, your comments rings of hyperbole unless you are willing to lead the charge by offering your own life before anyone else's.
    • jjuhl 7y ago
      "the absolute inhumanity of mass genocide" - If your focus is "survival of humans as a species", what's so "inhumane" about it? You are focusing too much on the individual human and not on the species. And of course I wouldn't sacrifice my own life first, since from my perspective that's obviously the most important thing and everything else is secondary. But once my life is preserved, I look at the bigger picture and see that we (I) would obviously be better off if we killed off 50% of the remaining population. Why is that so hard to wrap your head around? I'm fairly sure you would see it the same way (if you would just admit it to yourself).