Though I've never read the book, I've seen it mentioned so many times, I've gone to look at and skim pieces of it many, many times. My impression, which I agre

Though I've never read the book, I've seen it mentioned so many times, I've gone to look at and skim pieces of it many, many times. My impression, which I agree could be completely wrong but I'd still be willing to bet money on it, is that the book is poorly organized and really just seems to be a really long rant. It's impossible to tell what a chapter or section is about from its heading. To me, that tells me the authors really didn't have a solid concept of what point they wanted to make before they started. From what I've skimmed, most of the knowledge seems like things that shouldn't need to be said, perhaps some people need to hear them. Without some sort of organization it's impossible to tell which parts of the book might be worth reading for me, I certainly don't need to read all of it.