> 1: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/20.. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/20.... That article compares the

> 1: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/20.. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/green-living-blog/20.... That article compares the footprint of building a new car vs keeping and existing already built car, not ICE vs EV lifetime carbon footprint. The actual reduction in lifetime carbon footprint for an EV is around 50% vs and ICE, as described here: https://blog.ucsusa.org/rachael-nealer/gasoline-vs-electric-global-warming-emissions-953 https://blog.ucsusa.org/rachael-nealer/gasoline-vs-electric-... Not sure if you'd call that night and day, but it's pretty huge. > . But there's no doubt that the EV is a huge improvement in use, and switching a large portion of the trucks in our cities to EV would be giant win for air quality. Indeed, and by consequence, it should reduce the rate of respiratory illnesses in cities caused by particular air pollution today.